Miikka Terho and the Miracle of Sight

For many years now, atheists and evolutionists have claimed that the human eye is poorly designed because it is wired backwards.  At the same time, a number of creationists have written about the miraculous design of the human eye because of the backward wiring.  Due to the plethora of material already written on both sides, this article is not going to deal with this aspect of the design of the human eye.  Instead, I want to look at miracle of restored sight.

In March of 2009, news was made with a 73 year old man named Ron was fitted with what they called a bionic eye.  The doctors surgically implanted a series of electrodes on to Ron’s retina.  The other end of the electrodes was attached to a tiny receiver on the outside of his eye.  Ron was then fitted with a pair of special glasses that had a video camera and processor that sent a wireless signal to the receiver.  After 30 years of blindness, Ron is now able to see well enough to sort his socks and follow the white lines on the road.  Note that Ron had been with sight and only lost it when he was an adult.

Ron’s experience is a great example of modern medical technology as is our next subject.

Now I would like you to meet Miikka Terho, a 46 year old man from Finland.  Miikka had an inherited form of blindness that has caused him to go blind over time.  The doctors surgically implanted a small computer chip just behind Miikka’s retina.  The computer chip converts light into electrical impulses that it sends directly to the optic nerve, which then sends the signal to the brain. 

Several days after his surgery, Miikka reported that he started to see flashes of light.  Each day he would practice and work with the unit and slowly he began to process images better.  Miikka said that he had to train his mind to take the various components of what he was seeing and merge them together to form whole images.  For example, the people working with him had placed some large white letters on a black table.  When he first looked at the letters, he saw a series of white lines.  In time, he learned to mentally merge the lines to allow him to discern the letters.  They had purposely misspelled his first name and Mikkaa saw well enough to see the misspelling and correct the researchers. 

It took time for Miikka and several others that had received the chip implants to be able to mentally process the images they saw.  It wasn’t instantaneous. 

I recall watching one of those medical programs a number of years ago that dealt with a man that had lost his vision before he turned 2 years age due to an a very high fever.  The man was now in his later 40’s and had no memory of ever having been able to see.  The doctors performed surgery to problems in his eyes in hopes of at least restoring some of his vision.

When they removed the bandages, the man could begin to see, however he had no clue what he was seeing and it was more than he could bear.  Without any memory of vision, his brain was incapable of interpreting what he was seeing.  The images were so overwhelming and disorienting to him that he ended up covering his eyes.  Even after several months of repeated attempts to understand what he was seeing, he said it was like a form of insanity.  Eventually he went back to wearing black blinding eyeglasses and eye patches.  This man could not function with his new vision, but could function with his blindness.

The doctors on this program said that they were just understanding that our ability to interpret visual images is a learned process that starts from birth.  When babies stare wide eyed at different things, part of it is because their brains are haven’t yet learned what to make of the images and are in the process of storing the information.  Just like the stages an infant goes through in sitting up, walking, taking, etc., our vision develops over time as well. 

Since the man had lost his sight at such a young age, his brain never had the chance to fully develop that ability to fully interpret the visual signals it received.  Thus when his sight was restored as an adult, he wasn’t capable of coping with the barrage of new sensations.  It was the same as if the man had been born blind. 

This got me thinking about the account of the man born blind in John 9:1-7:

And as Jesus passed by, he saw a man which was blind from his birth.  And his disciples asked him, saying, Master, who did sin, this man, or his parents, that he was born blind?  Jesus answered, Neither hath this man sinned, nor his parents, but that the works of God should be showed on him.  I must work the works of him that sent me, while it is day: the night cometh when no man can work.  As long as I am in the world, I am the light of the world.  As soon as he had thus spoken, he spat on the ground, and made clay of the spittle, and anointed the eyes of the blind with the clay, And said unto him, Go wash in the pool of Siloam (which is by interpretation, Sent.) He went his way therefore and washed, and came again seeing.

Everyone today reads this account and thinks that the miracle Jesus performed was nothing more than making the man’s eyes function so that he could see.  Yet, from the experiences shown above, there was so much more to that miracle that we don’t realize.  Not only was the man able to physically see, but he also was instantly able to interpret what he saw.  There was no gradual progression of trying to train his mind to be able to process the images. 

Sight truly is something that could not have evolved, but had to be created from the very beginning.  Not only do you have to have a functioning eye, you also need to have a way to send the signals from the eye to the brain and then the brain has to be able to interpret the signals it receives.  It’s like setting up a webcam on your computer.  You need the camera (eye), the cable or wireless signal to carry the signal from the webcam to the computer (optic nerve) and then you need the software in the computer (brain) that takes that signal and form the visual image you see on the screen. 

The more we study and learn the complexities of sight, we see that from the creation of Adam in Genesis 1 to today, vision is a miracle that truly is a testimony to our Creator God.

8 Responses to Miikka Terho and the Miracle of Sight

  1. Greg Demme says:

    Great article. And just in case there are any skeptics out there who would try to claim that Jesus couldn’t have healed a man blind from birth because of an example like the man in his later 40s above who couldn’t remember ever having been able to see, we are given in the gospels (Mark 8:22-26) the account of Jesus healing a blind man in two stages – first the man could see “men, like trees walking,” then Jesus healed him completely, so that the man’s understanding was healed as well. Why heal this way if not to show us that Jesus was/is completely capable of overcoming every natural barrier, and at the same time thwarting every obstacle of the unbeliever?

    • Very true, Mr. Demme. On a side note, have you ever wondered about why the blind man described people as trees? I’ve had a few friends suggest this description had some significance, but I myself have never given it much thought.

      • Greg Demme says:

        Please, call me Greg.

        I haven’t given it much thought either. I guess my initial thought is that’s the only image he could come up with – he just wasn’t understanding what he was seeing yet. It doesn’t seem as if one could unequivocally say much more than that.

  2. Excellent article, David. You have truly placed me in more awe of Jesus’ miracle for the blind man! What a powerful God we serve.

  3. Nathaniel Hardt says:

    Great connection. You may be interested to know that Russell Grigg has used similar accounts to explain the double miracle of Mk 8:22-25 in his article, “Walking trees-Modern science helps us understand a puzzling miracle” Creation 21(4):54–55. Our Savior and Creator was not muddling his way through a miracle; nor did He need bumble along, creating through evolution. May His Name be exalted in all we do.

  4. Robert Glover says:

    If we recognize Jesus as truly God in the flesh,the awesomeness of John9:1-7 becomes even more apparent – this also applies to Jesus’ healing events in Mk.7:33, & Mk.8:22-25. Notice Jesus’ use of “spit”(moisture, &/ or “mist”), & compare this with the Creation of man in Gen.2:6,7 – look especially at Jn.9:1-7 where the man was born, essentially, without eyes, & notice how, in addition, Jesus used the “dust of the ground”, with the spit, to Create eyes where there were none before!!! Jesus did these things to establish that He was truly God in the flesh, the Creator of all things!

  5. Robert W.E. Jentzsch says:

    Praise God from whom all blessings flow – one of which is this wonderful website. The abundance of information here, on the fascinating works of our Creator and Savior, provides even greater blessings daily. If it were humanly possible, I would try to read every article on every topic. I’ll just read what I’m able for now and wait for that glorious day when all will be revealed.

    • Robert – thank you for your high praise. As editor-in-chief of the website, may I ask for two favors? 1) We covet your prayer support for wisdom and guidance in our desire to post information worthy of your high praise. 2) Please recommend our website to everyone you know and urge them to sign up for our newsletter.

ABOUT US COPYRIGHT © 2012. CREATIONREVOLUTION.COM IS A MEMBER OF Liberty Alliance. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.